1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

"A or B" side?

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Bob, Jul 4, 2004.

  1. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     



    › See More: "A or B" side?
  2. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  3. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  4. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  5. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  6. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  7. Hollis Ellis

    Hollis Ellis Guest

    Here in Southeast Virginia, its just reverse. Alltel is the 'A' carrier
    and Verizon is the 'B' carrier, however, Alltel is NOT in the Verizon
    PRL here either.

    Mike wrote:
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:30:59 GMT, Dave <davids1955@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I believe A/B side was originally when analog only cellular came out.
    >>The B side was usually the "wireline" phone company and A side was the
    >>other. With mergers and acquisitions this may not always be the case now
    >>though.

    >
    >
    > Here, VZW is the A side carrier (Cleveland/Akron/Canton, OH) and
    > Alltel is the B side carrier. I'm not entirely sure how that ended up
    > that way, likely through various acquisitions...so many cell phone
    > companies have changed hands, that likely nearly everywhere, you can't
    > say "A" is x-type of company and "B" is another type.
    >
    > Just because another company is on the other "A/B" side, doesn't mean
    > you can access it. VZW does not have Alltel in its PRL here in the
    > Cleveland/Akron area...and the phone will go to the PRL before
    > anything. About the only way you could really get Alltel is forcing
    > your phone to the B side, and I'm not even sure that would work if
    > there was a usable VZW signal on the A side. If you were within
    > Alltel's B side Cleveland/Akron coverage, and not within VZW's
    > (unlikely), it may dump into Alltel.
    >
    > This isn't the case in all markets with A/B "cellular" carriers. In
    > Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC, Alltel's system IS in
    > friendly roam status for VZW users.
    >
    > Mike
     
  8. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  9. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  10. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  11. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  12. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  13. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  14. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  15. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  16. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  17. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  18. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  19. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     
  20. Richard Ness

    Richard Ness Guest

    Sorry, wrong....
    U S West was U S West New Vector, the original "B" licensee in many of the
    western 14 states that U S West (RBOC) operated in. SEA, DEN, SLC, etc, etc...

    They were in existence from the very beginning of cellular in the US.
    As the fear of Judge Greene subsided, it then became U S West Cellular.
    A few years later, PacBell spun off their wireless into what then became
    AirTouch.

    So, in reality, U S West was in existence BEFORE AirTouch.

    Then there were mergers and more mergers, resulting in Verizon.


    "Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NONOcom> wrote in message news:etuge010qf3l42tl2uohhr78o1v13e3roq@4ax.com...
    > On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:11:19 -0500, Steven J Sobol
    > <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
    >
    > >I think AirTouch was created from a cellular unit of USWest, though, right?
    > >and PacTel sold to USWest...

    >
    > Airtouch was in existance before USWest. USWest cellular sold their
    > cellular license to Airtouch. Of course Airtouch became part of
    > Verizon Wireless.
    >
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?