1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

ATT vs. Verizon

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Brian Grigg, Jun 16, 2004.

  1. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     



    › See More: ATT vs. Verizon
  2. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  3. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  4. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  5. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  6. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  7. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  8. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  9. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  10. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  11. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  12. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  13. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  14. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  15. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  16. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  17. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  18. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  19. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     
  20. CharlesH

    CharlesH Guest

    When AT&T Wireless is absorbed by Cingular, won't the current AT&T
    Wireless customers be moved to Cingular?

    And the new AT&T provider (whatever it will be called) will start out
    with no customers, and have to convince people that it will be better
    to go with them as a SPCS reseller rather than SPCS directly?

    And they actually expect the public to understand that the old AT&T
    Wireless had no connection to AT&T Corporation, and the "new" AT&T
    wireless provider is totally unrelated to the "old" one?
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?