FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:05:27 -0600, Aboutdakota
<aboutdakota@hot-mail.com> posted in alt.cellular.verizon:

>Yeah, but many CDMA carriers will not activate or allow an ESN change to
>a phone that was not purchased from them. So, for instance, if only
>Verizon offers the Nokia 6969q, but Sprint offers teh 6969b, Verizon can
>decline to activate the ESN of the 6969b because it offers the 6969q.

Verizon doesn't. (I activated a Sprint 6035 on Verizon with just one
request for an ESN change.) From what I hear Altell doesn't. Sprint
won't activate any phone not sold by them.

Who am I leaving out?

 

Al Klein wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:54:53 -0500, Harry Krause
> <piedtypecase@yahoo.com> posted in alt.cellular.verizon:
>
>>That is correct. Fox is blatantly right-wing in its news and editorial
>>coverage. As is, for example, the Moonie newspaper, the Washington Times.
>
> The Washington Times is decidedly *NOT* right-wing. It would have to
> move FAR to the left to be right-wing.


It's all a matter of degree.

--
Email sent to piedtypecase@yahoo.com is never read.

 

Harry Krause wrote:
> Al Klein wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:54:53 -0500, Harry Krause
>><piedtypecase@yahoo.com> posted in alt.cellular.verizon:
>>
>>
>>>That is correct. Fox is blatantly right-wing in its news and editorial
>>>coverage. As is, for example, the Moonie newspaper, the Washington Times.
>>
>>The Washington Times is decidedly *NOT* right-wing. It would have to
>>move FAR to the left to be right-wing.
>
>
>
> It's all a matter of degree.
>

Ever wonder why Chicago is known as the windy city? Well, it's because
it's close to the middle of the continent, and Republicans in power SUCK
and Democrats in power BLOW.

==AD

 

Aboutdakota wrote:
>
> Harry Krause wrote:
> > Al Klein wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:54:53 -0500, Harry Krause
> >><piedtypecase@yahoo.com> posted in alt.cellular.verizon:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That is correct. Fox is blatantly right-wing in its news and editorial
> >>>coverage. As is, for example, the Moonie newspaper, the Washington Times.
> >>
> >>The Washington Times is decidedly *NOT* right-wing. It would have to
> >>move FAR to the left to be right-wing.
> >
> >
> >
> > It's all a matter of degree.
> >
>
> Ever wonder why Chicago is known as the windy city? Well, it's because
> it's close to the middle of the continent, and Republicans in power SUCK
> and Democrats in power BLOW.

Yeah, but as we all know, BLOW means SUCK.

They all SUCK!

Larry

 

In article <3FD61F79.6CA3EF40@spamcop.net>,
Lawrence Glasser <lglasser@spamcop.net> wrote:

> Yeah, but as we all know, BLOW means SUCK.
>
> They all SUCK!
>
> Larry

Take our Government back. Dean in 04 ! !

 

In article <bGlzb.437$z71.372@fe2.columbus.rr.com>,
nospam@nospam.com says...
> > Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,
> So what! After years of constant leftist propaganda from the other boys,
> the majority now has a source for news. You may see it as "right wing
> bias", I see it as RIGHT!
>
> > whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news
> Thought I would never see anyone admit this! I guess the wind blows because
> CNN sucks!
>
>
>
I know this isn't TV - but what do people think of the
Reuters site on the Web - any more balanced?
--
Louise

 

In article <MPG.1a57035c66392a489898fc@news.newsguy.com>
Louise <notreally@seesignature.com> wrote:

Almost any site is more fair and balanced than FOX. They probably have to
laugh every time they hear the logo, "fair and balanced." It is
surprising that they would bash ATT. Being the huge corporation and one
that sinks millions into the republican coffers, you'd think they would
be a little nicer to them.

 

Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote in
news:f7f8019a7903f6da20ecc9c9a554b565@firenze.linux.it:

> In article <MPG.1a57035c66392a489898fc@news.newsguy.com>
> Louise <notreally@seesignature.com> wrote:
>
> Almost any site is more fair and balanced than FOX. They probably have
> to laugh every time they hear the logo, "fair and balanced." It is
> surprising that they would bash ATT. Being the huge corporation and
> one that sinks millions into the republican coffers, you'd think they
> would be a little nicer to them.
>
>

Even the Clinton News Network, or Al-JaTerrorist...

Does Fox slant to the right - Yes
Does CNN slant to the left - Yes

Does this matter in the Nextel forum - No

 

In article <MPG.1a57035c66392a489898fc@news.newsguy.com>
Louise <notreally@seesignature.com> wrote:

This administration, or lack thereof, has polarized this country enough.
We know which news services are liberal and we know which are bush
shills. Fine! Now, we really don't have to discuss this on the wireless
newsgroups do we?

 

In article <Xns945E7F27CA6A2rgreenpcotmailom@65.32.1.6>
Richard Green <rgre@VERYhotmail.om> wrote:

A very weak attempt, if you can even call it an attempt, to cover up the
true facts, something the repubs have some amount of trouble recognizing,
and interjecting some claptrap about a past president. It's predictable
and of course, contemptible behavior that really doesn't fool anyone. The
payof is that DICK says, "does this matter on the nextel forum" and then
answers "no" only after spewing something that he just admitted "doesn't
mean anything." Take your own advice DICK.

 

X-No-archive: yes
X-No-Archive: yes
Message-ID: <slrnbsqke3.pbc.nospam@jbell.dns2go.com>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Lines: 14
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.222.79.163
X-Complaints-To: abuse@insightbb.com
X-Trace: attbi_s52 1070420420 12.222.79.163 (Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:00:20 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:00:20 GMT
Organization: Insight Broadband
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:00:20 GMT
Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.attws:18059 alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream:53029 alt.cellular.nextel:11883 alt.cellular.sprintpcs:126570 alt.cellular.verizon:129270

Tron wrote on [Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:19:03 GMT]:
>
> Oh no, is wittle baby lefty a wittle cranky because he knows there will be
> another 4 years of the current administration?

riiiiiight

> I love it... Fox is unbalanced right wing bla bla... But CNN is totally
> unbalanced and fair--Right, it didn't get the term Clinton News Network for
> nothing! (As well as PMSNBC)

Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,
whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news
you have to look elsewhere, as in another country

 

Louise <notreally@seesignature.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1a57035c66392a489898fc@news.newsguy.com:

> I know this isn't TV - but what do people think of the
> Reuters site on the Web - any more balanced?

No. While it's specialty is financial news services, it's bias is British
left-wing.

--
Last Wombat in Baghdad
Remove the '77' to reply