1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

LG VX 4400 Firmware Rev 11

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Eric Rosenberry, May 20, 2004.

  1. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    _REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > in response to a performance complaint.
    >
    > On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >
    > >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >
    > >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >
    > >-Eric
    > >

    >
    >

    Do you find it any better?

    I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    their cell sites since number portability.

    Louise
     



    › See More: LG VX 4400 Firmware Rev 11
  2. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    _REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > in response to a performance complaint.
    >
    > On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >
    > >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >
    > >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >
    > >-Eric
    > >

    >
    >

    Do you find it any better?

    I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    their cell sites since number portability.

    Louise
     
  3. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  4. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  5. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  6. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  7. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  8. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  9. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  10. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  11. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  12. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  13. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  14. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  15. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  16. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  17. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  18. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  19. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     
  20. On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise


    I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    revision #10.
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?