1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

LG VX 4400 Firmware Rev 11

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Eric Rosenberry, May 20, 2004.

  1. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     



    › See More: LG VX 4400 Firmware Rev 11
  2. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  3. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  4. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  5. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  6. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  7. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  8. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  9. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  10. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  11. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  12. Louise

    Louise Guest

    In article <1vlde01aqgg6gqgmtqj9atf34q1mn5fv1e@4ax.com>,
    hellothere.adelphia.net says...
    > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    > >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    > >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    > >> in response to a performance complaint.
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    > >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    > >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    > >> >
    > >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    > >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    > >> >
    > >> >-Eric
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >Do you find it any better?
    > >
    > >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    > >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    > >their cell sites since number portability.
    > >
    > >Louise

    >
    > I had mine udated to #11 and reception went way down. My wifes phone
    > would be showing full scale digital while I had analog. The store
    > tried everything and ended up giving me another phone that was
    > revision #10.
    >
    >

    INTERESTING - I'd been having a lot of reception problems and VZ swapped
    out my phone - they gave me v. 10 and I went back tot he store so they
    could update it to v 11.

    Then reception got even worse. Since there were problems anyway, I
    didn't think it was the revision.

    The phone had other problems and I swapped it out again. This time,
    partially on a hunch and partially out of exhuastion, I didn't bother to
    have it upgraded from rev 10 to rev 11 and reception has been ok.

    Perhaps rev 11 has a serious problem? If more people answer, I think
    we'll know....

    Louise
     
  13. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  14. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  15. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  16. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  17. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  18. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  19. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     
  20. cq_kp3

    cq_kp3 Guest

    Things I have noticed about ver 11 firmware on VX4400:

    1. Dropping to no service in full strength 1x native verizon areas
    fixed. (This was principal complaint).
    2. Earpiece levels seem lower.
    3. Service change notice beep seems quieter.
    4. Front body of phone (i.e. keypad area) does not heat so much during
    long duration calls. (Secondary original complaint)
    5. Suspect, but not enough tests yet, that auto earpiece volume
    function is less aggressive (good if true).

    -------

    On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 05:28:14 GMT, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <o4n9e0dfilft4suk4e3pg2udn9kmts8b07@4ax.com>, cq_kp3
    >_REMOVE@hotmaile.com says...
    >> Verizon (Hawthorne, California) just gave me version 11 this evening
    >> in response to a performance complaint.
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 May 2004 01:22:59 -0700, "Eric Rosenberry"
    >> <erics@R3MOVErosenberry.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I have heard on other forums that there may be a new firmware rev for the LG
    >> >VX 4400 (version 11).
    >> >
    >> >All the phones I am responsible for at this point have version 10. Does
    >> >anybody have version 11 and/or know anything about what it fixes?
    >> >
    >> >-Eric
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >Do you find it any better?
    >
    >I have a feeling/fear, that our "performance complaints" are really the
    >result of VZ having taken on too many new subscribers and over-using
    >their cell sites since number portability.
    >
    >Louise
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?