1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

More of Larry's BS...

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Richard Ness, Jul 3, 2004.

  1. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     



    › See More: More of Larry's BS...
  2. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  3. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  4. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  5. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  6. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  7. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  8. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  9. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  10. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  11. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  12. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  13. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  14. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  15. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  16. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  17. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  18. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  19. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  20. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:34:09 GMT, David S
    <dwstreeter@spamisnaughty.att.net> wrote:



    >Larry is wrong in that he doesn't recognize that a large number of smaller
    >cells is better than a small number of big cells.
    >
    >HOWEVER....
    >
    >Larry is right in that even a digital phone, on the fringe of a cell's
    >coverage or inside a building, would have a better chance of making and
    >keeping a call if it had a higher power output. A CDMA tower can always
    >command a phone capable of as much as 3W to ratchet down its power to 100
    >or 50 or even 10mW if that is what is necessary to keep the noise floor
    >even, but the tower CANNOT command a 200mW phone to go to 300mW to keep up
    >with the noise.


    This (almost) has nothing to do with analog of digital! It's simply
    increased usage and essentially creating more cells via more directional
    arrays per tower and higher tower density.

    They use the same frequencies, there are not digital vas analog antennas.
    Just arrays that cover smaller areas so one can have more cells.

    gerry

    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?