1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

My experience with Verizon Wireless (Bad naturally) - detailed contracts would be good

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Dan Albrich, Jul 4, 2004.

  1. Dan Albrich

    Dan Albrich Guest


    > verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    > agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    > might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    > Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.


    "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.

    -Dan
     



    › See More: My experience with Verizon Wireless (Bad naturally) - detailed contracts would be good
  2. Dan Albrich

    Dan Albrich Guest


    > verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    > agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    > might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    > Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.


    "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.

    -Dan
     
  3. Dan Albrich

    Dan Albrich Guest


    > verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    > agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    > might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    > Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.


    "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.

    -Dan
     
  4. Dan Albrich

    Dan Albrich Guest


    > verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    > agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    > might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    > Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.


    "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.

    -Dan
     
  5. Dan Albrich

    Dan Albrich Guest


    > verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    > agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    > might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    > Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.


    "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.

    -Dan
     
  6. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  7. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  8. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  9. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  10. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  11. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  12. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  13. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  14. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  15. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  16. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  17. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  18. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  19. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  20. Dan Albrich <junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui> wrote:
    >
    >> verizon's coverage did not change. Only who it had roaming
    >> agreements with changed. As another possibility, a roaming agreement
    >> might stay the same, but the roaming carrier's coverage might change.
    >> Neither is a reason for getting out of your contract.

    >
    > "Coverage" is an interesting word. When refering to a rate plan like AC,
    > then removing an included roaming partner does in fact change the coverage
    > area. Verizon did issue new maps when the coverage was removed.


    I think it could be argued either way. It's not NATIVE coverage but it is
    coverage that is billed as home-area coverage, so you could make either
    argument convincingly.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?