1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

PRL 50152 to 50175 in NY

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by SmartyPants, Jun 14, 2004.

  1. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:01 -0400, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <jeCdnbuzzcyPF1PdRVn2hw@comcast.com>,
    >junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui says...
    >> I decoded the PRL's you mention, then did a "diff" on the text. I checked
    >> the SID's and priority changes. I wasn't able to find anything that should
    >> effect your service in New York. CDMA coverage area breathes which means
    >> that as you get more users, there is less usable signal. While some other
    >> cellular technology doesn't work this way, it literally means that you will
    >> see less usable signal when the system is at capacity. i.e. More people use
    >> their phone, and your signal strength indication absolutely does go down.
    >>



    >I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >
    >I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >satisfied user for 6 years.
    >


    I've had this often, particularly in seasonal usage areas. Nearest tower
    gets saturated, you get directed to a distant tower with weak signal.

    There is an easy test for this - try the phone at 3 AM when few folks are
    on! If you get a good signal, it most likely a tower saturation issue.

    gerry


    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     



    › See More: PRL 50152 to 50175 in NY
  2. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:01 -0400, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <jeCdnbuzzcyPF1PdRVn2hw@comcast.com>,
    >junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui says...
    >> I decoded the PRL's you mention, then did a "diff" on the text. I checked
    >> the SID's and priority changes. I wasn't able to find anything that should
    >> effect your service in New York. CDMA coverage area breathes which means
    >> that as you get more users, there is less usable signal. While some other
    >> cellular technology doesn't work this way, it literally means that you will
    >> see less usable signal when the system is at capacity. i.e. More people use
    >> their phone, and your signal strength indication absolutely does go down.
    >>



    >I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >
    >I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >satisfied user for 6 years.
    >


    I've had this often, particularly in seasonal usage areas. Nearest tower
    gets saturated, you get directed to a distant tower with weak signal.

    There is an easy test for this - try the phone at 3 AM when few folks are
    on! If you get a good signal, it most likely a tower saturation issue.

    gerry


    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  3. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:01 -0400, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <jeCdnbuzzcyPF1PdRVn2hw@comcast.com>,
    >junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui says...
    >> I decoded the PRL's you mention, then did a "diff" on the text. I checked
    >> the SID's and priority changes. I wasn't able to find anything that should
    >> effect your service in New York. CDMA coverage area breathes which means
    >> that as you get more users, there is less usable signal. While some other
    >> cellular technology doesn't work this way, it literally means that you will
    >> see less usable signal when the system is at capacity. i.e. More people use
    >> their phone, and your signal strength indication absolutely does go down.
    >>



    >I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >
    >I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >satisfied user for 6 years.
    >


    I've had this often, particularly in seasonal usage areas. Nearest tower
    gets saturated, you get directed to a distant tower with weak signal.

    There is an easy test for this - try the phone at 3 AM when few folks are
    on! If you get a good signal, it most likely a tower saturation issue.

    gerry


    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  4. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:01 -0400, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <jeCdnbuzzcyPF1PdRVn2hw@comcast.com>,
    >junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui says...
    >> I decoded the PRL's you mention, then did a "diff" on the text. I checked
    >> the SID's and priority changes. I wasn't able to find anything that should
    >> effect your service in New York. CDMA coverage area breathes which means
    >> that as you get more users, there is less usable signal. While some other
    >> cellular technology doesn't work this way, it literally means that you will
    >> see less usable signal when the system is at capacity. i.e. More people use
    >> their phone, and your signal strength indication absolutely does go down.
    >>



    >I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >
    >I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >satisfied user for 6 years.
    >


    I've had this often, particularly in seasonal usage areas. Nearest tower
    gets saturated, you get directed to a distant tower with weak signal.

    There is an easy test for this - try the phone at 3 AM when few folks are
    on! If you get a good signal, it most likely a tower saturation issue.

    gerry


    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  5. gerry

    gerry Guest

    [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:01 -0400, Louise <none@nospam.com> wrote:

    >In article <jeCdnbuzzcyPF1PdRVn2hw@comcast.com>,
    >junkmail@shaney.uoregon.edui says...
    >> I decoded the PRL's you mention, then did a "diff" on the text. I checked
    >> the SID's and priority changes. I wasn't able to find anything that should
    >> effect your service in New York. CDMA coverage area breathes which means
    >> that as you get more users, there is less usable signal. While some other
    >> cellular technology doesn't work this way, it literally means that you will
    >> see less usable signal when the system is at capacity. i.e. More people use
    >> their phone, and your signal strength indication absolutely does go down.
    >>



    >I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >
    >I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >satisfied user for 6 years.
    >


    I've had this often, particularly in seasonal usage areas. Nearest tower
    gets saturated, you get directed to a distant tower with weak signal.

    There is an easy test for this - try the phone at 3 AM when few folks are
    on! If you get a good signal, it most likely a tower saturation issue.

    gerry


    --

    Personal home page - http://gogood.com

    gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots
     
  6. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  7. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  8. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  9. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  10. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  11. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  12. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  13. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  14. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  15. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  16. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  17. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  18. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  19. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     
  20. Quick

    Quick Guest

    Dan Albrich wrote:
    >> I too suspect it is a capacity issue. But what does one do?
    >>
    >> I'll never sign a 2 year contract again even though I've been a
    >> satisfied user for 6 years.
    >>
    >> Louise

    >
    > Yes, this is the real reason why I have consistently advised folks to
    > go with shorter contract length even though it costs more up front.
    > It really sucks to be locked into a contract for service you find
    > unacceptable and this can happen anywhere.


    really? how much? Where do you see the cost vs. risk points?
    2 year contract with new-any-2 on one end and purchase your
    own phone and activate month to month from the very start.

    -Quick
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?