SCHa350 vs VX4400?

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise

 

In my view, the 4400 was the best plain old phone Verizon had (for business
use mainly).

Now I have switched to the Nokia 3589i as our corporate standard. It has
great signal characteristics like the 4400, but it is a bar phone which to
some people is less desirable.

-Eric

"Louise" <none@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3c1df7bf2d7bb0989717@news.newsguy.com...
> I have a VX 4400 which was swapped out by VZ when they were busy
> insisting it was my phone rather than their network that was having
> trouble. Turned out it was their network but my own phone was long
> gone...
>
> Although the swapped out one works fine, the sound quality isn't as good
> or clear as the one I had and at its loudest, the incoming voice is a
> little too soft for a busy street.
>
> I'm looking at just getting another phone and I'm wondering about the
> new Samsung SCHa350 - it is lighter and thinner and tri mode...what else
> could anyone want?
>
> My greatest concern is signal strength because part of my house gets
> just enough signal to get calls and if I had a phone which wasn't at
> least as good as the VX4400 in holding a signal, it wouldn't work
> adequately.
>
> Another option is to go back to VZ and make them switch it out again -
> I'm just not sure it's worth it as I suspect all the ones they swap out
> are a little faulty in some way.
>
> Thoughts? TIA
>
> Louise