1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

Switching to Sprint? Opinions?

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Michael L., Jun 7, 2004.

  1. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     



    › See More: Switching to Sprint? Opinions?
  2. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  3. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  4. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  5. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  6. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  7. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  8. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  9. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  10. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  11. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  12. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  13. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  14. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  15. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-7F8D1D.05193317062004@news01.east.earthlink.net...
    > In article <aa02d0dd1v15nfgpsuvduo48b1hna1i9et@4ax.com>,
    > deb.milner@att.net wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:40:49 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > > <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >I've noticed you've brought back that 1,400,000 number in the past two

    days.
    > > >So Phillipe, just where is that simple copy and paste, along with a

    page
    > > >number out of the 10Q. After 20 plus requests from quite a few people

    here,
    > > >including yours truly, you still haven't backed up your statement.

    > >
    > > I can't speak about the number of customers who have left, but
    > > according to the FCC 2003 posting of complaint statistics, Sprint PCS
    > > was second only to AT&T in the number of complaints per 10K users.
    > >
    > > http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0511 FCC_Cell_ComplaintsAll3.pdf
    > > is the link to the graphic.
    > >
    > > AT&T wireless had 3.39 per 10K, Sprint had 2.25 per 10K with the other
    > > providers listed all having 1.6 or less.

    >
    > Amazing how a Sprint apologist can have a bad memory when they want to.
    > Sprint's own 10-K filing with the SEC listed it as losing 1,400,000
    > customers in the first calendar quarter.


    The only one here who has a bad memory here Phillipe ... is you! Just where
    is the text from the 10Q and on what page? A simple copy and paste of the
    text, along with the page number is all that has been asked ... yet you have
    never posted it ... Just why is that Phillipe?

    Bob
     
  16. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    <deb.milner@att.net> wrote in message
    news:l612d09crfn7kh15sugq3fkra6vpa1ikda@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:27:11 GMT, O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >> ONLY if total roaming minutes are less than half of the total minutes
    > >> used that month.
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >Actually, no. If you exceed that 50% limit, you're still covered.
    > >We send you a friendly reminder of the 50% limit, but cover you
    > >unless you exceed it twice within a 3-month period.

    >
    > Which can really suck if you are a frequent traveller, and get stuck
    > in areas where PCS just can't be found. (On retrospect, in the larger
    > metro areas, I just realized it is in the industrial areas or "just
    > outside city limits".)
    >
    >
    > Deb


    Deb, maybe I missed a post here in this thread, but not once have I read
    where you tried a different phone model in the areas you travel, like a
    Sanyo or a Nokia? Have you?

    I ask as I have a friend in Neptune Beach, who travels all over
    Jacksonville, and gets coverage in those areas on the interstates that you
    said you had problems with. I don't know what SPCS phone she's using, but
    she isn't experiencing the same problems you apparently do.

    Bob
     
  17. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    <deb.milner@att.net> wrote in message
    news:l612d09crfn7kh15sugq3fkra6vpa1ikda@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:27:11 GMT, O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >> ONLY if total roaming minutes are less than half of the total minutes
    > >> used that month.
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >Actually, no. If you exceed that 50% limit, you're still covered.
    > >We send you a friendly reminder of the 50% limit, but cover you
    > >unless you exceed it twice within a 3-month period.

    >
    > Which can really suck if you are a frequent traveller, and get stuck
    > in areas where PCS just can't be found. (On retrospect, in the larger
    > metro areas, I just realized it is in the industrial areas or "just
    > outside city limits".)
    >
    >
    > Deb


    Deb, maybe I missed a post here in this thread, but not once have I read
    where you tried a different phone model in the areas you travel, like a
    Sanyo or a Nokia? Have you?

    I ask as I have a friend in Neptune Beach, who travels all over
    Jacksonville, and gets coverage in those areas on the interstates that you
    said you had problems with. I don't know what SPCS phone she's using, but
    she isn't experiencing the same problems you apparently do.

    Bob
     
  18. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    <deb.milner@att.net> wrote in message
    news:l612d09crfn7kh15sugq3fkra6vpa1ikda@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:27:11 GMT, O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >> ONLY if total roaming minutes are less than half of the total minutes
    > >> used that month.
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >Actually, no. If you exceed that 50% limit, you're still covered.
    > >We send you a friendly reminder of the 50% limit, but cover you
    > >unless you exceed it twice within a 3-month period.

    >
    > Which can really suck if you are a frequent traveller, and get stuck
    > in areas where PCS just can't be found. (On retrospect, in the larger
    > metro areas, I just realized it is in the industrial areas or "just
    > outside city limits".)
    >
    >
    > Deb


    Deb, maybe I missed a post here in this thread, but not once have I read
    where you tried a different phone model in the areas you travel, like a
    Sanyo or a Nokia? Have you?

    I ask as I have a friend in Neptune Beach, who travels all over
    Jacksonville, and gets coverage in those areas on the interstates that you
    said you had problems with. I don't know what SPCS phone she's using, but
    she isn't experiencing the same problems you apparently do.

    Bob
     
  19. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    <deb.milner@att.net> wrote in message
    news:l612d09crfn7kh15sugq3fkra6vpa1ikda@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:27:11 GMT, O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >> ONLY if total roaming minutes are less than half of the total minutes
    > >> used that month.
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >Actually, no. If you exceed that 50% limit, you're still covered.
    > >We send you a friendly reminder of the 50% limit, but cover you
    > >unless you exceed it twice within a 3-month period.

    >
    > Which can really suck if you are a frequent traveller, and get stuck
    > in areas where PCS just can't be found. (On retrospect, in the larger
    > metro areas, I just realized it is in the industrial areas or "just
    > outside city limits".)
    >
    >
    > Deb


    Deb, maybe I missed a post here in this thread, but not once have I read
    where you tried a different phone model in the areas you travel, like a
    Sanyo or a Nokia? Have you?

    I ask as I have a friend in Neptune Beach, who travels all over
    Jacksonville, and gets coverage in those areas on the interstates that you
    said you had problems with. I don't know what SPCS phone she's using, but
    she isn't experiencing the same problems you apparently do.

    Bob
     
  20. Bob Smith

    Bob Smith Guest

    <deb.milner@att.net> wrote in message
    news:l612d09crfn7kh15sugq3fkra6vpa1ikda@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:27:11 GMT, O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >> ONLY if total roaming minutes are less than half of the total minutes
    > >> used that month.
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >Actually, no. If you exceed that 50% limit, you're still covered.
    > >We send you a friendly reminder of the 50% limit, but cover you
    > >unless you exceed it twice within a 3-month period.

    >
    > Which can really suck if you are a frequent traveller, and get stuck
    > in areas where PCS just can't be found. (On retrospect, in the larger
    > metro areas, I just realized it is in the industrial areas or "just
    > outside city limits".)
    >
    >
    > Deb


    Deb, maybe I missed a post here in this thread, but not once have I read
    where you tried a different phone model in the areas you travel, like a
    Sanyo or a Nokia? Have you?

    I ask as I have a friend in Neptune Beach, who travels all over
    Jacksonville, and gets coverage in those areas on the interstates that you
    said you had problems with. I don't know what SPCS phone she's using, but
    she isn't experiencing the same problems you apparently do.

    Bob
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?