1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

Using a Motorolla T8367 on verizon (was pcs)

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by 4th Amendment defiled by Patriot Act, Jul 5, 2004.

  1. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     



    › See More: Using a Motorolla T8367 on verizon (was pcs)
  2. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  3. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  4. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  5. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  6. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  7. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  8. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  9. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:33:01 GMT, Røbert M. wrote:

    > What does it say about the relative customer friendliness of the two
    > companies then?


    What customer friendliness? VZW has been dropping Sprint as a roaming
    partner every where thay can across the country for months now.
     
  10. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  11. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  12. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  13. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  14. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  15. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  16. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  17. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  18. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  19. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     
  20. Strongbox

    Strongbox Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:00:01 -0500, Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Strongbox <strongbox@no.mail> wrote:
    >
    >> Virtually impossible, since Sprint guards their locking codes like their
    >> virgin daughter.

    >
    > Ha! Virgin! Heheh.
    >
    > (Was that intended to be a pun?)


    I'll never tell <G>......
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?