1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

Verizon to buy all of Qwest's Wireless Assets

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Andrew Shepherd, Jul 2, 2004.

  1. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     



    › See More: Verizon to buy all of Qwest's Wireless Assets
  2. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  3. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  4. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  5. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  6. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  7. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  8. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  9. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  10. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  11. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  12. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  13. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  14. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  15. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  16. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  17. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  18. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  19. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  20. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?