1. Welcome to Verizon Forums - the unofficial Verizon community! Have a question about Verizon? Click HERE to get started.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Expecting Cell Phone Forums? We recently moved Verizon specific content to VerizonForums.com. If you previously had an account on CPF, it has been transferred!
    Dismiss Notice

Verizon to buy all of Qwest's Wireless Assets

Discussion in 'alt.cellular.verizon' started by Andrew Shepherd, Jul 2, 2004.

  1. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     



    › See More: Verizon to buy all of Qwest's Wireless Assets
  2. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  3. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  4. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  5. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  6. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  7. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  8. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  9. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  10. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  11. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  12. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  13. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  14. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  15. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  16. Røbert M.

    Røbert M. Guest

    In article <BUEGc.62848$up4.18490@fe20.usenetserver.com>,
    Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:

    > Røbert M. wrote:
    >
    > > So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    > > uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?
    >
    > It seems they only want to cover the major highways and major cities.
    > If they want "seamless" coverage they're doing a piss poor job of it.


    And don't ever dare complain about coverage not extending indoors.
     
  17. In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:
    > R?bert M. wrote:
    >
    >> So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    >> uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?


    Do you think anyone is doing major buildouts in those four states? Do you
    think anyone is going to cover places off the major highways where there's
    going to be minimal population and they might not be able to recoup their
    costs, even if they continue building out in those states?


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  18. In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:
    > R?bert M. wrote:
    >
    >> So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    >> uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?


    Do you think anyone is doing major buildouts in those four states? Do you
    think anyone is going to cover places off the major highways where there's
    going to be minimal population and they might not be able to recoup their
    costs, even if they continue building out in those states?


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  19. In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:
    > R?bert M. wrote:
    >
    >> So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    >> uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?


    Do you think anyone is doing major buildouts in those four states? Do you
    think anyone is going to cover places off the major highways where there's
    going to be minimal population and they might not be able to recoup their
    costs, even if they continue building out in those states?


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     
  20. In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net> wrote:
    > R?bert M. wrote:
    >
    >> So by not buying all the Towers, SprintPCS is ignoring its still
    >> uncovered areas of Wyoming, Montana, North & South Dakota? Check the map.

    >
    > Do you think Sprint has any intention of installing decent nationwide
    > coverage?


    Do you think anyone is doing major buildouts in those four states? Do you
    think anyone is going to cover places off the major highways where there's
    going to be minimal population and they might not be able to recoup their
    costs, even if they continue building out in those states?


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
     

Welcome to VerizonForums!

Unfortunately you can't reply until you log in or sign up.


Forgot your password?